Here are others who have participated in proposal reviews and have opinions on the utility of AI generated options…
@NathanosDev @ZoLee @tiago89 @Gekctek @Cris.MntYetti
Personally, I prefer to see human effort on these proposal reviews. I am all for automating repetitive tasks and making the reviewers life easier, but I don’t like the idea of automating the critical thinking or diluting the learning opportunity. I’m a first principles guy though. I prefer to periodically derive the formulas that I use every day so I can stay sharp on the fundamentals. That’s kind of how I see these proposal reviews. We need people in the community who are studying the code and understand how it works. It seems to me that a good way to stay sharp on the fundamentals is to read through it yourself in order to understand the changes as opposed to relying on an AI. I can understand and respect other opinions though. I’m not the one actually performing the work, so I would defer to their opinions anyway.