@andrea kindly provided a reference for the recent urz34 (II system subnet) proposals here → Subnet Management - pzp6e (Fiduciary) - Developers - Internet Computer Developer Forum (dfinity.org)
-
Proposal: 131506 - ICP Dashboard (internetcomputer.org)
- “Halt subnet uzr34 at the next CUP height and update ssh readonly access. This is the first proposal (out of three) for resharing the threshold Schnorr keys Bip340Secp256k1:key_1 and Ed25519:key_1 from subnet pzp6e to subnet uzr34.”
-
Proposal: 131510 - ICP Dashboard (internetcomputer.org)
- “Reshare the threshold Schnorr keys Bip340Secp256k1:key_1 and Ed25519:key_1 to subnet uzr34 by updating its recovery CUP. This is the second proposal (out of three) for resharing the threshold Schnorr keys Bip340Secp256k1:key_1 and Ed25519:key_1 from subnet pzp6e to subnet uzr34”
-
Proposal: 131511 - ICP Dashboard (internetcomputer.org)
- “Unhalt subnet uzr34 and remove ssh readonly access. This is the third and last proposal for resharing the threshold Schnorr keys Bip340Secp256k1:key_1 and Ed25519:key_1 from subnet pzp6e to subnet uzr34”
I adopted the 1st and 3rd proposals, but rejected the update recovery CUP proposal, as discussed here. Nevertheless, I’m super excited to see these signature schemes used outside the context of the test key subnets