Subnet Management - pae4o (Application)

Proposal 134979 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces node djil5 which appears in the dashboard as “Status: Active” for the stated reason “offboarding the second rack of nodes in the mb1 DC after 48 months”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are improved with respect to country and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov…

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these topics and Synapse on most other topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron and KongSwap with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal 134979 Review | LORIMER Known Neuron

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Decentralisation stats are improved with respect to countries (see Decentralisation Stats below for more info). There is also a clear public declaration for the cordoned node which is referred to in the proposal summary. 1 cordoned node in Slovenia replaced with an unassigned node in Singapore.

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 104.032 km 7739.195 km 16348.372 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km (+192.9%) 8256.653 km (+6.7%) 16654.257 km (+1.9%)

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience). :+1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 5 12 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 5 13 (+7.7%) 13 13 13 13

This proposal slightly improves decentralisation in terms of jurisdiction diversity. :+1:

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 2 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 5 (-16.666666666666664%) 1 (-50%) 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove djil5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Maribor (mb1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG 3xiew
Add klluj UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore (sg1) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital d4bin
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
xs5iy UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
ieaic UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Toronto 2 (to2) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs 4lp6i
ucumw UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 4 (zh4) Nine.Ch Tomahawk.vc paxme
q6bkk UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
hcjwo UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Pindar Technology Limited vzsx4
3pjo5 UP :bar_chart: Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
kax7o UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
ja4ju UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
5flj4 UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
y6xdi UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana 2 (lj2) Anonstake Anonstake eu5wc
owedb UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Orlando (or1) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC redpf
trupz UP :bar_chart: Africa South Africa Gauteng 1 (jb1) Teraco Karel Frank 2rzvs

*This comment references the latest comment in the Subnet Management - General Discussion thread only to generate an automated cross-link from the general thread (to improve topic navigation).


You may wish to follow D-QUORUM if you found this analysis helpful.

Known Neurons to follow if you're too busy to keep on top of things like this

If you found this analysis helpful and would like to follow the vote of the LORIMER known neuron in the future, consider configuring LORIMER as a followee for the Subnet Management topic.

Additional good neurons to follow:

  • D-QUORUM (a highly decentralized neuron that follows neurons that have been elected by the NNS)
  • Synapse (currently follows the LORIMER and CodeGov known neurons for Subnet Management, and is a generally well informed known neuron to follow on numerous other topics)
  • WaterNeuron (the WaterNeuron DAO frequently discuss proposals like this in order to vote responsibly based on DAO consensus)

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

Proposal #134979 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal replaces cordoned healthy Active status node djil5 in the MB1 DC from Slovenia, with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node klluj from Singapore, with slight improvement to the decentralization of the subnet.
Motivation is offboarding the second rack of nodes in the mb1 DC after 48 months, in line with the forum post.

About CodeGov (click to expand).

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these topics and Synapse on most other topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron and KongSwap with a known neuron and credible Followees.


Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like

Proposal 134979 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Replaces cordoned node djil5 with node klluj on subnet pae4o.
The reason for this proposal is to offboard the MB1 DC consistent with forum posts made on the forum thread used for posts regarding the renovation/sell of Gen-1 node machines by NPs.
Both the NP and DC stated in the forum post match the ones from the node being removed in the proposal.

About CodeGov…

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these topics and Synapse on most other topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron and KongSwap with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like