Voted to adopt proposal 134280. This proposal is part of a sequence of steps to remove cordoned nodes from subnets as the associated data centeres are being offboarded after 48 months of their respective DC contracts that are still private and were signed up before the Genesis. There is a great and detailed explanation of this changes in this forum post and the forum thread it is in. In the wiki there is a series of Steps for Gen-1 Node onboarding after 48 months that need to be followed in order for the nodes to continue earning rewards which starts by making a forum post in the following thread. As we can verify no one as come forward with nodes from the DCs in this proposals so I donāt see any issues with the removal of this nodes.
Voted to adopt proposal 134409.
This proposal replaces node dafyf which appears in the dashboard as āStatus: Activeā. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.
The stated purpose of this change is āoffboarding CH3 DC after 48 monthsā. Removal of the nodes for this purpose is consistent with this post from the node provider, the processes described in the same forum thread and the information in the MI Servers node provider record in the IC dashboard. Additionally, the self-declaration documents provided match the provided hashes. I note that there are 3 other nodes assigned to subnets with the same DC and same NP that will probably also need removal for the same reason.
1 Like
Proposal 134409
Vote: ADOPT
This proposal is part of a sequence of steps to remove cordoned nodes from subnets as the associated data centeres are being offboarded after 48 months of their respective DC contracts that are still private and were signed up before the Genesis. There is a great and detailed explanation of this changes in this forum post and the forum thread it is in. In the wiki there is a series of Steps for Gen-1 Node onboarding after 48 months that need to be followed in order for the nodes to continue earning rewards which starts by making a forum post in the following thread. As we can verify no one as come forward with nodes from the DCs in this proposals so I donāt see any issues with the removal of this nodes.
Iāve voted to adopt proposal 134409. Iāve verified that decentralisation coefficients weāre not modified by this proposal. The proposal links directly to what appears to be discussion with the NP about the proposal. However, Iām uncomfortable about adopting a proposal using this sort of evidence (given the ease with which such posts could be forged by the proposer).
Iām currently thinking about starting a discussion, and an associated motion proposal, about how to make this sort of thing more verifiable.