Indeed. There’s a long and recurring discussion about this which I linked to in my review. My understanding is that this should already be considered the policy, which is why I’ve rejected. I’d be happy to adopt any future proposal like this that follows procedure, and ensures the associated information required for verification is presented in the proposal summary.
I personally think policies are important, and are pointless if they’re not required to be followed in order for a proposal to pass. Having said that I completely understand why others will be happy to adopt this proposal given that the relevant information has been provided after the fact 