Subnet Management - General Discussion

New ‘Change Subnet Membership’ proposals have been raised:

  • uzr34 (currently unclear why certain unassigned nodes haven’t been used)
  • pzp6e (looks good, adopted :+1:)
  • tdb26 (looks good, adopted :+1:)
  • 5kdm2 (looks good, adopted :+1:)
  • mpubz (looks good, adopted :+1:)

@Sat, can I ask what’s stopping you from announcing these proposals on the forum and providing a link in the proposal summary to the forum discussion? I’m aware this will become a formal requirement in September (NNS proposal discussions - Governance / NNS proposal discussions - Internet Computer Developer Forum (dfinity.org)), but it seems like something that would be easy enough to start doing now wouldn’t it?

Most voters currently won’t know where to look when they see one of these proposals in the NNS dapp. Do you have any objections to providing a link to the forum?

3 Likes