Subnet Management - brlsh (Application)

Governance NNS proposal discussions
, ,
21

Rejected proposal 134566. There’s no time to review this and the 18 other proposals in the same batch properly over Xmas eve, Xmas and Boxing Day. This is a non-critical proposal.

More information and discussion on this thread.

22

Proposal 134566

Vote: ADOPT

Replaces cordoned nodes vqrj7 and vwdbg with nodes gyty5 and xpit6 on subnet brlsh.
The reason for this proposal is to offboard TY2 and SG3 DCs consistent with forum posts made on the forum thread used for posts regarding the renovation/sell of Gen-1 node machines by NPs.
Both the NP and DC stated in the forum post and forum post match the ones from the node being removed in the proposal.

1 Like
23

Voted to adopt proposal #134566.

The proposal replaces two cordoned nodes, one healthy Active status node vqrj7 from the SG3 Data Center in Singapore 3, and cordoned healthy Active status node vwdbg from the TY2 Data Center in Tokiyo, with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node gyty5 from Germany and with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node xpit6 from Singapore 2, without any change to the decentralization of the subnet.
The motivation makes sense and the provided Forum link included in the summary provides further info, also it can be checked here.

24

A new proposal with ID 135427 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet brlsh

Motivation:

  • replacing dead node mm6rd

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

  • 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet brlsh-zidhj-3yy3e-6vqbz-7xnih-xeq2l-as5oc-g32c4-i5pdn-2wwof-oae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

  • mm6rd-xljck-xtc6c-fr6jt-wioua-zyexr-pqlyh-t5bqu-yr63s-6dhwo-5qe [health: dead]

Nodes added:

  • i7zdo-qrk2t-phjla-2unbd-p76z5-eg2m3-yko4n-5dclc-rewwh-t33gv-wae [health: healthy]
    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                        country   
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                        -------   
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    aw1          1 -> 0    AtlasEdge               1    British Columbia       1    AU       1
    4jjya-hlyyc-s766p-fd6gr-d6tvv-vo3ah-j5ptx-i73gw-mwgyd-rw6w2-rae       1    bc1               1    Cyxtera                 1    Brussels Capital       1    BE       1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    br2               1    DEAC                    1    Hesse                  1    CA       1
    6r5lw-l7db7-uwixn-iw5en-yy55y-ilbtq-e6gcv-g22r2-j3g6q-y37jk-jqe       1    dl1          0 -> 1    Digital Realty          1    HongKong               1    CH       1
    7a4u2-gevsy-5c5fs-hsgri-n2kdz-dxxwf-btcfp-jykro-l4y7c-7xky2-aqe  1 -> 0    fr2               1    Equinix                 1    Ljubljana              1    DE       1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    hk1               1    Flexential         0 -> 1    Melbourne              1    HK       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    lj1               1    Green.ch                1    New Delhi              1    IN       1
    eipr5-izbom-neyqh-s3ec2-52eww-cyfpg-qfomg-3dpwj-4pffh-34xcu-7qe  0 -> 1    mn2               1    Marvelous Web3 DC       1    Pennsylvania      1 -> 0    KR       1
    g2ax6-jrkmb-3zuh3-jibtb-q5xoq-njrgo-5utbc-j2o7g-zfq2w-yyhky-dqe       1    nd1               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Riga                   1    LV       1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    rg1               1    NEXTDC                  1    Seoul                  1    SE       1
    pa5mu-yxsey-b4yrk-bodka-dhjnm-a3nx4-w2grw-3b766-ddr6e-nupu4-pqe       1    sg2               1    Posita.si               1    Singapore              1    SG       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    sh1               1    Telin                   1    Stockholm              1    SI       1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    sl1               1    Tierpoint          1 -> 0    Texas             0 -> 1    US       1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae       1    zh6               1    Unicom                  1    Zurich                 1
25

Proposal 135427 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet brlsh, appearing in the decentralization tool as “DOWN”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

26

Proposal 135427 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: One offline node replaced with an unassigned node. IC Target Topology metrics remain unchanged, but the average distance between nodes increases slightly.

Country Discrepancies (2)

There a relatively large country discrepancy (in terms of distance). Given that ipinfo.io uses a probe network for geolocation, I’m surprised to see such a large discrepancy. Something to revisit (given that the node in question isn’t directly affected by this proposal).

Node Data Center Claimed Country According to ipinfo.io
2eqbk Vancouver Canada United States of America (the)
kdldi Brussels 2 Belgium United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 304.712 km 7392.887 km 16616.248 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km 7521.81 km (+1.7%) 16616.248 km

This proposal slightly increases decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical increase in localised disaster resilience). :+1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 4 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 132136

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

image
image949×420 75.8 KB

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove mm6rd DOWN :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Allentown (aw1) Tierpoint Bigger Capital codio
Add i7zdo UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Dallas (dl1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC mw64v
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
lus5w UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
kdldi UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
2eqbk UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
pvo54 UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
gyty5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
gsvxv UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Wancloud limited z6cfb
nj7re UP :bar_chart: Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
5hni3 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
qhfut UP :bar_chart: Europe Latvia Riga 1 (rg1) DEAC MB Patrankos šūvis jptla
qbij2 UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
xpit6 UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
jx6y5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana (lj1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG gl27f

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

27

Proposal 135427 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Unhealthy node replaced.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
mm6rd-xljck-xtc6c-fr6jt-wioua-zyexr-pqlyh-t5bqu-yr63s-6dhwo-5qe → i7zdo-qrk2t-phjla-2unbd-p76z5-eg2m3-yko4n-5dclc-rewwh-t33gv-wae DOWN → UNASSIGNED US → US Pennsylvania → Texas Bigger Capital → 87m Neuron, LLC aw1 → dl1 Tierpoint → Flexential
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 1 2 13
City 5 1 1 13
Data Center 5 1 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 1 2 13
City 5 1 1 13
Data Center 5 1 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like
28

Proposal 135427 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces offline nodes in Allentown (North America).
The decentralization stats remain the same.

:warning: Warning

The last few proposals that address the outage of DC is offloading all nodes to one Node provider. @DRE-Team Is there a way we can address this issue in the future to offload nodes into multiple Node providers. I will vote to Adopt to recover this issue in hopes that this feature will be addressed.

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Bigger Capital 87m Neuron, LLC
Location Changes
Removed Added
North America, Allentown North America, Dallas
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
mm6rd… DOWN Bigger Capital aw1 Allentown
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
i7zdo… UNASSIGNED 87m Neuron, LLC dl1 Dallas

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node mm6rd…: Health check passed.

:white_check_mark: Node mm6rd…: Remove from Subnet check passed.

:white_check_mark: Node i7zdo…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like
29

Proposal #135427 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted
Reason:
The proposal replaces dead Offline status node mm6rd from the AW1 DC in Pennsylvania, with unassigned healthy Awaiting status node i7zdo from Dallas without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

30

Proposal 135427 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal replaces a dead nodes on subnet brlsh:
dead node mm6rd Dashboard Status: Offline with node i7zdo Dashboard Status: Awaiting

There is no impact in the overall decentralization across all features.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

31

A new proposal with ID 135841 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet brlsh

Motivation:

  • replacing degraded node gsvxv

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

  • 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet brlsh-zidhj-3yy3e-6vqbz-7xnih-xeq2l-as5oc-g32c4-i5pdn-2wwof-oae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

  • gsvxv-tou7p-drlxw-rnldp-m7z3n-e42j4-nrsp4-dzsfc-7wuqr-2qwpf-pae [health: degraded]

Nodes added:

  • jux3z-ivwyz-ury64-jth4b-rrbfi-sx5af-ci72l-j4ot3-nl5jk-z4ilu-6qe [health: healthy]
    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                   country   
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                   -------   
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    bc1               1    AtlasEdge               1    British Columbia  1    AU       1
    4jjya-hlyyc-s766p-fd6gr-d6tvv-vo3ah-j5ptx-i73gw-mwgyd-rw6w2-rae       1    br2               1    Cyxtera                 1    Brussels Capital  1    BE       1
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  0 -> 1    dl1               1    DEAC                    1    Hesse             1    CA       1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    fr2               1    Digital Realty          1    HongKong          1    CH       1
    6r5lw-l7db7-uwixn-iw5en-yy55y-ilbtq-e6gcv-g22r2-j3g6q-y37jk-jqe       1    hk1          1 -> 0    Equinix                 1    Ljubljana         1    DE       1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    hk4          0 -> 1    Flexential              1    Melbourne         1    HK       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    lj1               1    Green.ch                1    New Delhi         1    IN       1
    eipr5-izbom-neyqh-s3ec2-52eww-cyfpg-qfomg-3dpwj-4pffh-34xcu-7qe       1    mn2               1    Marvelous Web3 DC       1    Riga              1    KR       1
    g2ax6-jrkmb-3zuh3-jibtb-q5xoq-njrgo-5utbc-j2o7g-zfq2w-yyhky-dqe  1 -> 0    nd1               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Seoul             1    LV       1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    rg1               1    NEXTDC                  1    Singapore         1    SE       1
    pa5mu-yxsey-b4yrk-bodka-dhjnm-a3nx4-w2grw-3b766-ddr6e-nupu4-pqe       1    sg2               1    Posita.si               1    Stockholm         1    SG       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    sh1               1    Telin                   1    Texas             1    SI       1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    sl1               1    Unicom             1 -> 0    Zurich            1    US       1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae       1    zh6               1    hkntt              0 -> 1
32

Proposal 135841 Review | aligatorr - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Replaces degraded node.

  • Proposed topology Nakamoto Coefficient stayed the same as on current topology.
Node Changes 1 removed, 1 added
Node ID Status Country City Node Provider Data Center Data Center Owner
gsvxv-tou7p-drlxw-rnldp-m7z3n-e42j4-nrsp4-dzsfc-7wuqr-2qwpf-pae → jux3z-ivwyz-ury64-jth4b-rrbfi-sx5af-ci72l-j4ot3-nl5jk-z4ilu-6qe DEGRADED → UNASSIGNED HK → HK HongKong → HongKong Wancloud limited → Web3game hk1 → hk4 Unicom → hkntt
Current Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13
Proposed Nakamoto Coefficients and Topology, avg = 5.00
Attribute Nakamoto Coefficient Identical attribute values Max allowed identical values Unique Counts
Country 5 3 13
City 5 1 13
Data Center 5 1 13
Data Center Owner 5 1 13
Node Provider ID 5 1 13

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals.
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals.
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like
33

Proposal 135841 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet brlsh, appearing in the decentralization tool as “DEGRADED”. As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

1 Like
34

Proposal 135841 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES :white_check_mark:

TLDR:
The proposal replaces degraded node in HongKong (Asia).
No issues were found in the nodes or locations proposed and decentralization stats remain the same. I vote to adopt

Provider Changes
Removed Added
Wancloud limited Web3game
Location Changes
Removed Added
Asia, HongKong 1 Asia, HongKong 4
Nodes Removed 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
gsvxv… DEGRADED Wancloud limited hk1 HongKong 1
Nodes Added 1
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
jux3z… UNASSIGNED Web3game hk4 HongKong 4

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: Node gsvxv…: Health check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node gsvxv…: Remove from Subnet check passed.
:white_check_mark: Node jux3z…: Replacement Status check passed.

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like
35

Proposal 135841 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR: Degraded node replaced with an unassigned node. Decentralisation stats are unchanged - LGTM.

Country Discrepancies (2)

Within a margin of error in terms of the actual distances involved.

Node Data Center Claimed Country According to ipinfo.io
2eqbk Vancouver Canada United States of America (the)
kdldi Brussels 2 Belgium United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the)
Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 304.712 km 7521.81 km 16616.248 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km 7520.075 km 16616.248 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 4 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description

  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)

  • Green marker represents an added node

  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node

  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

  • Black dotted line connects to a small black marker that shows where the IP address indicates the node is located (according to ipinfo.io). This is only displayed if it conflicts with where IC records indicate the node is located. See Country Discrepancies section above for more info.

image
image959×414 55.3 KB

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove gsvxv DEGRADED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Wancloud limited z6cfb
Add jux3z UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
lus5w UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
kdldi UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
2eqbk UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
pvo54 UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
gyty5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
nj7re UP :bar_chart: Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
5hni3 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
qhfut UP :bar_chart: Europe Latvia Riga 1 (rg1) DEAC MB Patrankos šūvis jptla
qbij2 UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
xpit6 UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
jx6y5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana (lj1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG gl27f
i7zdo UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Dallas (dl1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC mw64v

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron (coming soon) if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

1 Like
36

Proposal #135841 — Zack | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposal replaces Degraded status node gsvxv from Hong Kong with
unassigned healthy Awaiting status node jux3z from Hong Kong4 without any change to decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes
37

Proposal 135841 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Replaces degraded node gsvxv Dashboard Status: Degraded with node jux3z Dashboard Status: Awaiting on subnet brlsh.

The proposal makes a necessary replacement by removing the degraded node.

There is no impact in the decentralization.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.

2 Likes
38

A new proposal with ID 136576 has been submitted, please take a look.

Click here to open proposal details

Replace a node in subnet brlsh

Motivation:

  • replacing cordoned node jux3z (freeing up nodes from Web3game in order to update ipv6)

Calculated potential impact on subnet decentralization if replacing:

  • 1 additional node would result in: equal decentralization across all features

Based on the calculated potential impact, not replacing additional nodes to improve optimization.

Note: the information below is provided for your convenience. Please independently verify the decentralization changes rather than relying solely on this summary.
Here is an explaination of how decentralization is currently calculated,
and there are also instructions for performing what-if analysis if you are wondering if another node would have improved decentralization more.

Decentralization Nakamoto coefficient changes for subnet brlsh-zidhj-3yy3e-6vqbz-7xnih-xeq2l-as5oc-g32c4-i5pdn-2wwof-oae:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto comparison: 5.00 → 5.00 (+0%)

Overall replacement impact: equal decentralization across all features

Details

Nodes removed:

  • jux3z-ivwyz-ury64-jth4b-rrbfi-sx5af-ci72l-j4ot3-nl5jk-z4ilu-6qe [health: healthy]

Nodes added:

  • q3sji-7croe-uqcsz-rva4e-orlkf-c4y44-b2sl4-shnns-l57fz-fn2wa-xqe [health: healthy]
    node_provider                                                              data_center            data_center_owner            area                        country        
    -------------                                                              -----------            -----------------            ----                        -------        
    4dibr-2alzr-h6kva-bvwn2-yqgsl-o577t-od46o-v275p-a2zov-tcw4f-eae       1    bc1               1    AtlasEdge               1    British Columbia       1    AU            1
    4jjya-hlyyc-s766p-fd6gr-d6tvv-vo3ah-j5ptx-i73gw-mwgyd-rw6w2-rae       1    br2               1    Cloud9             0 -> 1    Brussels Capital       1    BE            1
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1 -> 0    dl1               1    Cyxtera                 1    Hesse                  1    CA            1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe       1    fr2               1    DEAC                    1    HongKong          1 -> 0    CH            1
    6r5lw-l7db7-uwixn-iw5en-yy55y-ilbtq-e6gcv-g22r2-j3g6q-y37jk-jqe       1    hk4          1 -> 0    Digital Realty          1    Ljubljana              1    DE            1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae       1    lj1               1    Equinix                 1    Melbourne              1    GE       0 -> 1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe       1    mn2               1    Flexential              1    New Delhi              1    HK       1 -> 0
    eipr5-izbom-neyqh-s3ec2-52eww-cyfpg-qfomg-3dpwj-4pffh-34xcu-7qe       1    nd1               1    Green.ch                1    Riga                   1    IN            1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe       1    rg1               1    Marvelous Web3 DC       1    Seoul                  1    KR            1
    pa5mu-yxsey-b4yrk-bodka-dhjnm-a3nx4-w2grw-3b766-ddr6e-nupu4-pqe       1    sg2               1    Megazone Cloud          1    Singapore              1    LV            1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae       1    sh1               1    NEXTDC                  1    Stockholm              1    SE            1
    vegae-c4chr-aetfj-7gzuh-c23sx-u2paz-vmvbn-bcage-pu7lu-mptnn-eqe  0 -> 1    sl1               1    Posita.si               1    Tbilisi           0 -> 1    SG            1
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae       1    tb1          0 -> 1    Telin                   1    Texas                  1    SI            1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae       1    zh6               1    hkntt              1 -> 0    Zurich                 1    US            1
1 Like
39

Proposal 136576 Review | Lorimer - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO

TLDR: The proposal does not provide reference to sufficient evidence in order to verify/confirm its claim.

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
EXISTING 304.712 km 7520.075 km 16616.248 km
PROPOSED 304.712 km 7211.433 km (-4.1%) 16616.248 km

This proposal slightly reduces decentralisation, considered purely in terms of geographic distance (and therefore there’s a slight theoretical reduction in localised disaster resilience). :-1:

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
EXISTING 4 13 13 13 13 13
PROPOSED 4 13 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
EXISTING 6 1 1 1 1 1
PROPOSED 6 1 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 135700

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Red marker represents a removed node (transparent center for overlap visibility)
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Blue marker represents an unchanged node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)
  • Light grey markers with yellow borders are examples of unassigned nodes that would be viable candidates for joining the subnet according to formal decentralisation coefficients (so this proposal can be viewed in the context of alternative solutions that are not being used)

image
image956×436 56.4 KB

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Remove jux3z UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Web3game dg7of
Add q3sji UNASSIGNED :bar_chart: Asia Georgia Tbilisi 1 (tb1) Cloud9 George Bassadone yhfy4
Other Nodes
Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
lus5w UP :bar_chart: Oceania Australia Melbourne 2 (mn2) NEXTDC Icaria Systems Pty Ltd l5lhp
kdldi UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels 2 (br2) AtlasEdge Allusion oorkg
2eqbk UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
pvo54 UP :bar_chart: Europe Switzerland Zurich 6 (zh6) Green.ch Sygnum Bank ciprs
gyty5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd 3nu7r
nj7re UP :bar_chart: Asia India New Delhi 1 (nd1) Marvelous Web3 DC Zenith Code LLC ihcmc
5hni3 UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 1 (sl1) Megazone Cloud Neptune Partners ukji3
qhfut UP :bar_chart: Europe Latvia Riga 1 (rg1) DEAC MB Patrankos šūvis jptla
qbij2 UP :bar_chart: Europe Sweden Stockholm 1 (sh1) Digital Realty DFINITY Stiftung lgp6d
xpit6 UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qffmn
jx6y5 UP :bar_chart: Europe Slovenia Ljubljana (lj1) Posita.si Fractal Labs AG gl27f
i7zdo UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Dallas (dl1) Flexential 87m Neuron, LLC mw64v

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

40

Proposal 136576 | Tim - CodeGov

Vote: Adopt

This proposal replaces 1 node in subnet brlsh , appearing in the decentralization tool as “UP”, at the request of its node provider (Web3game). As shown in the proposal, decentralisation parameters are unchanged and remain within the requirements of the target topology.

About CodeGov

CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neurons’ Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralisation of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.