Hi @Jarred-Sauce , all,
please find below a draft assessment of this proposal against our design goals . Feedback on this assessment is very welcome!
- Decentralized & active: Neutral.
- Secure & available: Neutral.
- Long-term thinking: Neutral.
- Efficient & scalable: Neutral. Potentially could become positive by making use of the spam label for filtering, so that users can choose not to see proposals which are labelled as spam by others.
- Reactive: Neutral.
- Purposeful: skew rewards, bad content
- Bad content: Neutral
- Skew rewards: There seems to be still an incentive to submit spam proposals as it will increase the rewards paid out to active voters.
- Simple & accessible: Neutral.