# RFC: Standardising how smart contracts expose state

**URL:** <https://forum.dfinity.org/t/rfc-standardising-how-smart-contracts-expose-state/8544>\
**Category:** Developers\
**Created:** [November 12, 2021, 1:17pm UTC](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/rfc-standardising-how-smart-contracts-expose-state/8544 "2021-11-12T13:17:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 23

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![akhilesh.singhania](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/flex023/user_avatar/forum.dfinity.org/akhilesh.singhania/32/487_2.png) [@akhilesh.singhania](https://forum.dfinity.org/u/akhilesh.singhania)\
**Post date:** [January 19, 2022, 9:29am UTC](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/rfc-standardising-how-smart-contracts-expose-state/8544/23 "2022-01-19T09:29:56Z")

</div>

> [@Canister integrity verification on chain is missing](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/canister-integrity-verification-on-chain-is-missing/10353/15):
>
> @bogdanwarinschi , @bjoern , and I have been discussing the RFC and we are going to start working on the spec changes.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/rfc-standardising-how-smart-contracts-expose-state/8544)._