Observed Tactic : “Selective Execution & Misdirectional Packaging”
This is how it works:
- Multi-Part Proposals with One Beneficial Lever
A proposal is written to include several “technical improvements” or “optimizations” (as seen in @ysyms’s post). Most are reasonable or even helpful on paper —like better age mechanics or fair reward rebasing. - Cherry-Pick the Most Exploitable Clause
Only the clause that lowers the barrier (e.g., Step 3: reducing minimum dissolve delay to 3 months) is executed , while the counterbalancing reforms (Steps 1, 4) are ignored or postponed indefinitely. - Decentralization Narrative Used as Cover
These changes are framed as pro-community or “flexibility increasing” to appear progressive. But the real effect is to empower large, liquid actors (like WaterNeuron or backdoor-coordinated wallets). - Cross-Topic Misdirection in Forum Threads
Discussion is scattered across multiple forum threads and Telegram/Discord groups, ensuring that no single place holds the full timeline or logic path. This disperses accountability and obscures causal links. - Short Neuron Abuse & High-Turnover Staking
With only Step 3 activated, short-term dissolve neurons (e.g., 3 months) can now earn maturity—enabling quick in/out voting rotations by actors with large ICP bags, without aligning long-term incentives. - Governance Capture via Sharded Influence
Node ownership and SNS control is fragmented into legal shells (like “Sisyphus Stiftung”) and "independent” foundations—while ultimately traceable to the same financier (David Fisher, et al). This simulates decentralization while consolidating actual control.