@borovan if you are going to go around submitting Participant Management proposals to remove node providers that you suspect as bad actors, then perhaps you should at least read this forum thread in detail. It has a lot of history of the changes that have happened over the last 6 months. You need to know this information in detail before you wreck something and you need to consult with DFINITY or someone who knows what they are doing. If you are so worried about your massive stake in the internet computer, then please let the people who know what they are doing make these proposals. I know my stake is a lot smaller than yours, but it’s large enough that I care about these subnets and node providers and I don’t want you to mess anything up. I also don’t want to see you start a massive panic in the market for ICP because you are making it look like a cluster fuck and creating confusion when the reality is that there is nothing wrong.
About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron’s Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.
Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.