Just FYI, I think at least these two commits should have been included in the proposal summary but weren’t - b032518, ccec3cb
As mentioned last week, I’m in the process of writing up a forum topic to try and prompt some brainstorming for ways to avoid these sorts of issues (I think it feeds into deeper discussions that I’ve tried to start previously (on slack) about how commits and branches are managed). This also relates to the fact that the ‘Properly handle updating of reserved cycles limit’ commit is referenced again in this proposal summary, even though it was technically part of the previous week’s proposal (under a different commit, but which is essentially the exact same change).