You have an oversimplified view. Most followers don’t keep tabs on the neuron they’re following, other than that it votes. In any case, you’re off topic. This is about how limited funding is being utilised (or not utilised).
What are you talking about? 
In any case, any social consensus you think there is in CodeGov is fragile and artificial. It exists at Wenzel’s discretion. He’s “willing to listen”, but don’t go “mistaking that for decentralized management of CodeGov” (Wenzel’s own words).
Are you asking me to explain how the NNS Governance stores neurons, or how canister controlled neurons work? I’ve cross-posted your question to the appropriate thread and answered your question there.
To summarise the salient points in this thread. CodeGov does not locally run the high impact Protocol Canister Management code that they’re paid to review on an ongoing basis (significant sums of ICP). There has been no attempt to build out any sort of test suite. CodeGov was elected into this position by the community. Concerns that have been raised in this thread have been met by abusive and dismissive messages.
The IC community can do so much better. It needs to do better. It will do better. A re-election cannot come soon enough.