New Node Provider Proposals

Roadmap
,
1199

Proposal 137251 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: REJECT

The proposal registers a new NP No name provided. The proposal doesn’t follow all the requirements stated here. Also regarding new KYC requirements that should be public please refer to proposal 136573 (Pilot to Assess Node Provider Independence and Improve Decentralization) to verify that the documents provided check every box of public disclosure.

  1. A Forum post by the NP :white_check_mark:
  2. The self-declaration, Proof of Identity and Assessment of Independence documents were uploaded on the IC Wiki :white_check_mark:
  3. The hashes of the documents match the hashes in the proposal :x:
  4. Node Provider ID is new :white_check_mark:

@Icswitch thanks for the proposal. Unfortunately I think not referencing the hashes in the summary might be an important threshold for rejecting a proposal. They are a nice way of looking if documents have changed since an Add Node Provider proposal.

Although reviews usually have an hash verification in this type of proposals that could be checked to verify if documents and hence hashes have changed, reviews shouldn’t be a source of truth, only proposals. I rejected the proposal for this reason, and also gives you the opportunity to fix other points in your proposal summary, such as linking all your documents instead of just your wiki page and proposing a name for your node provider.

Proposal 137256 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal removes Node Operator g3nqx-pr6l2-lc6ew-e3atl-453oe-4ahoe-znboc-7a2yb-pl6zx-4x7xj-zae from NP Carbon Twelve with 0 registered nodes in the registry and 4 type3.1 rewardable_nodes.

Using the dre tool, I verified that the NO proposed to be removed follows one of the criteria (second not mandatory since this proposal achieves the same end result of 0 rewards).

Details of Node Operator g3nqx in the registry 
{
      "node_operator_principal_id": "g3nqx-pr6l2-lc6ew-e3atl-453oe-4ahoe-znboc-7a2yb-pl6zx-4x7xj-zae",
      "node_provider_principal_id": "qsdw4-ao5ye-6rtq4-y3zhm-icjbj-lutd2-sbejz-4ajqz-pcflr-xrhsg-jae",
      "dc_id": "pr1",
      "rewardable_nodes": {
        "type3.1": 4
      },
      "node_allowance": 7,
      "ipv6": "",
      "computed": {
        "node_provider_name": "Carbon Twelve",
        "node_allowance_remaining": 7,
        "node_allowance_total": 7,
        "total_up_nodes": 0,
        "nodes_health": {},
        "max_rewardable_count": {
          "type3.1": 4
        },
        "nodes_in_subnets": 0,
        "nodes_in_registry": 0
      }
    },

This proposal is a consequence of NP Carbon Twelve having sold it’s nodes, for more context check this previous posts Buyer NP post and Selling NP post

Proposal 137257 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal removes Node Operator gyzti-tfcdb-uikoy-udtxn-vwv6w-mvcw7-kot2t-py7ob-idpla-ft5nl-gqe from NP Carbon Twelve with 0 registered nodes in the registry and 4 type3.1 rewardable_nodes.

Using the dre tool, I verified that the NO proposed to be removed follows one of the criteria (second not mandatory since this proposal achieves the same end result of 0 rewards).

Details of Node Operator gyzti in the registry 
{
      "node_operator_principal_id": "gyzti-tfcdb-uikoy-udtxn-vwv6w-mvcw7-kot2t-py7ob-idpla-ft5nl-gqe",
      "node_provider_principal_id": "qsdw4-ao5ye-6rtq4-y3zhm-icjbj-lutd2-sbejz-4ajqz-pcflr-xrhsg-jae",
      "dc_id": "es1",
      "rewardable_nodes": {
        "type3.1": 4
      },
      "node_allowance": 4,
      "ipv6": "",
      "computed": {
        "node_provider_name": "Carbon Twelve",
        "node_allowance_remaining": 4,
        "node_allowance_total": 4,
        "total_up_nodes": 0,
        "nodes_health": {},
        "max_rewardable_count": {
          "type3.1": 4
        },
        "nodes_in_subnets": 0,
        "nodes_in_registry": 0
      }
    },

This proposal is a consequence of NP Carbon Twelve having sold it’s nodes, for more context check this previous posts Buyer NP post and Selling NP post

Proposal 137270 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal removes Node Provider Rivonia Holdings LLC as this NP is offboarding after having sold it’s nodes to ParaFi Technologies NS LLC, for more context check this previous posts why nodes were sold? and ParaFi Technologies introduction

Proposal 137271 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

The proposal removes Node Provider Aksinia Stavskaya as this NP is offboarding after having sold it’s nodes to ANTHONY ISAAKIDIS, for more context check this previous post node transaction details from Aksinia Stavskaya

About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
1 Like