Neuron Fund Design Flaw Proposal

[Accumulating.icp]

@wpb

disagree with this claim. Your previous proposal was moderated because so many comments from the community were in significant violation of rules and guidelines on the forum. None of the content of you proposals or relevant community responses has ever been censored.

Theres a difference between moderating comments & locking a thread. Moderators very selectively moderated comments, allowed escalation, instigation, and then locked the thread in the middle of a conversation, as shown below.

Absolute Majority Weight Proposal Draft

Show me how this addresses spam. I’ll wait. There’s a reason you’ve been avoiding this so hard. You all say “Well you should knowww” - but I’m laying out the facts in front of you, show the common courtesy and educate me aswell! Also, do you notice how in the next line of the screenshot you’ve posted, it says “but first it should be clarified that this change is much more important because it incentivizes further improvement towards decentralization” [IMG_9292]

@wpb

I don’t think I asked you to justify anything

@wpb

Why do you want this proposal to have on-chain documentation? What value does that bring to you? Why is forum documentation not good enough?

In regards to your comment about “actually proposing this one” - what’s the value in re-proposing something that has already passed? It just dignifies the claim that DFINITY can unilaterally void proposals.