What are we doing about SEO? Sites within the IC will want to be findable by the old internet. Can we return the raw files to bots and allow them to read them normally at the boundary level?
For example: User A wants to make a cool newsletter site using ICME but notices it never appears on Google Search. Even if he puts in an extremely specific exact search. His newsletter is unnoticed by the general population. He may consider putting it back into the old web just to get the normal SEO.
I propose this be a high target item on the roadmap. Not as just dev. But as someone who understands real world problems that big tech is eating up. Um, um.
I wonder how we could leverage the community to help design and implement software changes to the IC.
On-chain governance in the form of the NNS is unique to the IC, and could help the network evolve much faster than other blockchains. (Look how long it’s taking for ETH 2.0.)
I’d bet there are quite a few of us who would be willing to help actually write the Rust code to add features to the IC. Being bottlenecked by the DFINITY Foundation on all of these large-scale changes doesn’t seem to be sustainable (or fast enough) in the long term. If we have a more formalized reward system and proposal review process for decentralized source code contributions, I think this could be a huge advantage for the IC.
Well, as you know, in one of my proposals I did actually write the code to implement the proposed change.
I agree that there may be a bottleneck with waiting on the DFINITY foundation to implement features that are voted upon. However, in this situation I think the bottleneck is not in the implementation, so I also agree that an improved process around proposing changes is needed.
A good next target seems to be open sourcing all code with each repository accepting pull requests from DFINITY and the community. If we can get to that point we’ll be in a good position to allow individuals, companies, DAOs, etc to start contributing.
The canister needs more detailed permission control. For example, the controller can upgrade the code and view the canister status; the observer cannot upgrade the code, but can only view the canister status.
Use a canister to manage the canisters of different users, just to get the status of these canisters, you need this function.
I’m not an expert on the ICP ecosystem yet but yes in the blockchain.
This is my first review after completed the staking process and the following neurons>
I don’t very know if the followees are verified teams and if someone could create one as a ICP holder.
In that case for a staking period of 7+ years I see some kind of risk associated, for both
parts the token holder and the ICP ecosystem, since I know
this neurons has a lot of power.
What about to make a partnership with VeChain for the verification process?
They’re solving real world challenges for the Carbon footprint, Web3, DAO and Sustainability and they have strong partnerships in the quality audits.
And also a way to see all of this verified token holders on a list.