How to fix the spam proposals that NNS is currently encountering

[wpb]

I think the best way to answer your questions is to point you to a post I made a few days ago in response to similar questions asked by @Zane…

Reset Followees for the "All Topics Except Governance" Category

You are right that active stakers would get more rewards initially. In some ways it is the mathematical equivalent of submitting an infinite number of governance proposals every day without submitting any spam proposals, at least in the beginning. That’s why it removes the incentives to spam the NNS with governance proposals. They are no longer needed if the spamming is happening for the purpose of higher voting rewards. Those higher rewards for active neurons currently come at the expense o…

Here is another response to a question from @skileshare that lends some insight as well…

Proposal to restrict rewards qualification to a threshold

I would argue that the imbalance that we have right now is not the proposal weights. When I stop to think about the weights, they feel right. There is no way that exchange rate proposals should be valued the same as governance proposals, especially since there are 144 of them every day. Instead, I argue that the imbalance is the participation rate. I think there is too much satisfaction in the community with treating ICP tokenomics like a security. It is not stock in a company. It is a gov…