# DFINITY Foundation’s vote on Governance proposal #80970 (“Spam proposal”) and #86639 ("Temperature Check")

**URL:** <https://forum.dfinity.org/t/dfinity-foundation-s-vote-on-governance-proposal-80970-spam-proposal-and-86639-temperature-check/16156>\
**Category:** Developers\
**Created:** [October 25, 2022, 9:14pm UTC](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/dfinity-foundation-s-vote-on-governance-proposal-80970-spam-proposal-and-86639-temperature-check/16156 "2022-10-25T21:14:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 133

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AndraGeorgescu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/8c91f0/32.png) [@AndraGeorgescu](https://forum.dfinity.org/u/AndraGeorgescu)\
**Post date:** [October 27, 2022, 9:54pm UTC](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/dfinity-foundation-s-vote-on-governance-proposal-80970-spam-proposal-and-86639-temperature-check/16156/133 "2022-10-27T21:54:34Z")

</div>

When I am talking about “abandoned ICP” I am talking about the temp check proposal to which Dfinity voted yes to. Not the spam prevention proposal which introduced this concept.

The temp check proposal that wanted to create a treasury and linked to this forum post that explains the concept in great detail: [A Call to Action: Using the NNS for Growth](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/a-call-to-action-using-the-nns-for-growth/15839)

I believe that there is just reason for concern and dismissing it is not the best way forward. Also I don’t believe I’m dividing the community at all. If anything this proposal and its detailed forum post have managed to do that.

---

_[View the full topic](https://forum.dfinity.org/t/dfinity-foundation-s-vote-on-governance-proposal-80970-spam-proposal-and-86639-temperature-check/16156)._