Adjusting Target Topology for Caffeine Scaling: 60 application subnets and a US subnet

Governance
61

Proposal 137339 Review | Lorimer :infinity: :dog_face: - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO

TLDR: The proposed subnet topology contains 2 nodes from the rbn2y+g7dkt+acqus cluster (more than 1 breaks the ‘independent party’ imperative that each subnet needs to adhere to). The nodes involved are:

Further reasoning, commentary and justification for my vote can be found here.

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
PROPOSED 14.244 km 7911.901 km 18504.433 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
PROPOSED 3 10 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
PROPOSED 5 2 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 137147

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

image
image1475×421 77.9 KB

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Add gl7lj UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Antwerp (an1) Datacenter United DeNoDe z4wll
Add fabpy UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
Add bydvi UP :bar_chart: North America Canada Vancouver (bc1) Cyxtera Blockchain Development Labs feb2q
Add 63rak UP :bar_chart: North America Costa Rica San José 1 (cr1) Navegalo GeoNodes LLC eqv2i
Add gby4c UP :bar_chart: Europe Germany Frankfurt 2 (fr2) Equinix Virtual Hive Ltd ujq4k
Add jognp UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 1 (hk1) Unicom Pindar Technology Limited vzsx4
Add 4nldz UP :bar_chart: Europe Isle of Man Douglas 2 (im2) Continent8 Zarety LLC ylbc3
Add 34vxs UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 2 (kr2) Gasan Web3game 5dwhe
Add bjhao UP :bar_chart: Europe Romania Bucharest (bu1) M247 Iancu Aurel c5ssg
Add mcm3l UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qxonx
Add dglrt UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 3 (sg3) Racks Central Protocol16 vicvb
Add 4whgz UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Phoenix (ph1) CyrusOne MI Servers 5bnm2
Add op35h UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Washington 1 (se1) Evocative DFINITY Stiftung xph6u

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

1 Like
62

Proposal 137338 Review | Lorimer :infinity: :dog_face: - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO

TLDR: The proposed subnet topology contains 2 nodes from the rbn2y+g7dkt+acqus cluster (more than 1 breaks the ‘independent party’ imperative that each subnet needs to adhere to). The nodes involved are:

Further reasoning, commentary and justification for my vote can be found here.

Decentralisation Stats

Subnet node distance stats (distance between any 2 nodes in the subnet) →

Smallest Distance Average Distance Largest Distance
PROPOSED 14.244 km 8116.092 km 18504.433 km

Subnet characteristic counts →

Continents Countries Data Centers Owners Node Providers Node Operator
PROPOSED 3 9 13 13 13 13

Largest number of nodes with the same characteristic (e.g. continent, country, data center, etc.) →

Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
PROPOSED 7 2 1 1 1 1

See here for acceptable limits → Motion 137147

The above subnet information is illustrated below, followed by a node reference table:

Map Description
  • Green marker represents an added node
  • Highlighted patches represent the country the above nodes sit within (red if the country is removed, green if added, otherwise grey)

image
image1460×407 77.2 KB

Node Changes
Action Node Status Continent Country Data Center Owner Node Provider Node Operator
Add lhviu UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Antwerp (an1) Datacenter United NODAO k4aor
Add akpwl UP :bar_chart: Europe Belgium Brussels (br1) Digital Realty Allusion mjeqs
Add nbela UP :bar_chart: North America Costa Rica San José 1 (cr1) Navegalo GeoNodes LLC eqv2i
Add 5ei6o UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 3 (hk3) hkcolo Power Meta Corporation 4lbqo
Add amy5r UP :bar_chart: Asia Hong Kong HongKong 4 (hk4) hkntt Origin Game aaxec
Add ntq7u UP :bar_chart: Europe Isle of Man Douglas 1 (im1) Manx Telecom Blue Ant LLC 4isre
Add covnt UP :bar_chart: Asia India Panvel 2 (pl2) Yotta Krishna Enterprises 7rw6b
Add 2ric4 UP :bar_chart: Asia Japan Tokyo 3 (ty3) Equinix Starbase 7ldwr
Add wjwzb UP :bar_chart: Asia Korea (the Republic of) Seoul 2 (kr2) Gasan Web3game 5dwhe
Add 6plly UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 2 (sg2) Telin OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital qxonx
Add 45wdz UP :bar_chart: Asia Singapore Singapore 3 (sg3) Racks Central Protocol16 vicvb
Add rbq63 UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Atlanta 2 (at2) Datasite Giant Leaf, LLC spsu4
Add tzemr UP :bar_chart: North America United States of America (the) Washington 1 (se1) Evocative DFINITY Stiftung xph6u

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA △

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

Note that this analysis involved data provided by the IC-API, which is not open source. I’m in the process of switching over to more verifiable sources of this sort of information for future proposal reviews. See here for related discussion.

2 Likes
63

Proposal 137338 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: NO :cross_mark:

TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet

Total Nodes: 13
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
covnt… UP Krishna Enterprises pl2 Panvel 2
45wdz… UP Protocol16 sg3 Singapore 3
6plly… UP OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital sg2 Singapore 2
amy5r… UP Origin Game hk4 HongKong 4
rbq63… UP Giant Leaf, LLC at2 Atlanta 2
wjwzb… UP Web3game kr2 Seoul 2
nbela… UP GeoNodes LLC cr1 San José 1
5ei6o… UP Power Meta Corporation hk3 HongKong 3
2ric4… UP Starbase ty3 Tokyo 3
tzemr… UP DFINITY Stiftung se1 Washington 1
akpwl… UP Allusion br1 Brussels
lhviu… UP NODAO an1 Antwerp
ntq7u… UP Blue Ant LLC im1 Douglas 1

Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.2

Dimension Nakamoto Coefficient Reason
Provider 5 No single provider controls a large portion of the nodes
Country 3 SG, HK, BE each have 2 nodes, lowers country diversity
Location (City) 3 Duplicate cities like Singapore and HongKong reduce geographic spread
Data Center 5 Every node is hosted in a distinct data center
Data Center Owner 5 All nodes are owned by different infrastructure providers

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: All nodes are in UNASSIGNED STATUS for subnet additions

:warning: Issues:

:cross_mark: Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.2: See above

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

1 Like
64

Proposal 137339 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet. As mentioned by @aligatorr89 can we have proper stance of possible cluster with Allusion,DeNoDe,NODAO by Dfinity. A small adjustment (e.g., avoiding SG or BE duplication) could increase Nakamoto Coefficient to 4.6+.

Total Nodes: 13
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
4nldz… UP Zarety LLC im2 Douglas 2
4whgz… UP MI Servers ph1 Phoenix
bydvi… UP Blockchain Development Labs bc1 Vancouver
bjhao… UP Iancu Aurel bu1 Bucharest
op35h… UP DFINITY Stiftung se1 Washington 1
jognp… UP Pindar Technology Limited hk1 HongKong 1
34vxs… UP Web3game kr2 Seoul 2
gby4c… UP Virtual Hive Ltd fr2 Frankfurt 2
63rak… UP GeoNodes LLC cr1 San José 1
mcm3l… UP OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital sg2 Singapore 2
gl7lj… UP DeNoDe an1 Antwerp
fabpy… UP Allusion br1 Brussels
dglrt… UP Protocol16 sg3 Singapore 3

Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.4

Dimension Nakamoto Coefficient Reason
Provider 5 Good distribution across different node providers
Country 3 Singapore (SG), Belgium (BE), and US have 2 nodes each
Location (City) 4 Some cities repeated (e.g., Singapore), slightly lowering diversity
Data Center 5 All nodes hosted in different data centers
Data Center Owner 5 No single data center owner dominates

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: All nodes are in UNASSIGNED STATUS for subnet additions

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

2 Likes
65

Proposal 137340 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet. This proposal also needs stance of possible cluster with Allusion,DeNoDe,NODAO by Dfinity.

Total Nodes: 13
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
32yxi… UP Web3game hk4 HongKong 4
hhau4… UP Rivram Inc nm1 Navi Mumbai 1
ttjma… UP 87m Neuron, LLC dl1 Dallas
4jf5x… UP ANYPOINT PTY LTD sc1 Queensland 1
txayu… UP Protocol16 sg3 Singapore 3
e6qmp… UP Blockchain Development Labs to2 Toronto 2
xgowg… UP Blue Ant LLC im1 Douglas 1
mvsqq… UP Allusion br1 Brussels
kzqmb… UP Illusions In Art (Pty) Ltd ct1 Cape Town 1
jtisj… UP DFINITY Stiftung se1 Washington 1
agmug… UP DeNoDe an1 Antwerp
vhklp… UP Virtual Hive Ltd fr2 Frankfurt 2
cgh42… UP Tomahawk.vc zh3 Zurich 3

Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.6

Dimension Nakamoto Coefficient Reason
Provider 5 Well distributed across diverse providers
Country 3 BE and US have 2 nodes each, reducing country diversity slightly
Location (City) 5 Excellent distribution across different cities
Data Center 5 Each node is in a unique data center
Data Center Owner 5 No single infrastructure provider dominates

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: All nodes are in UNASSIGNED STATUS for subnet additions

:white_check_mark: Nakamoto Coefficient at 4.6, closer to 5

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

2 Likes
66

Proposals #137338, 137339, 137340, 137341, & 137342 — ZoLee | CodeGov

Vote: Adopted

Reason:
The proposals are correct and are inline with the previously adopted proposal 137147 that also serves as suggestion for the Subnet Target Structure until the NNS adopts a new target topology.
All proposals add new application subnets to support the growth of Caffeine. The chosen nodes for these 5 new subnets are all healthy unassigned at the time of the review and the payload is standard for subnet_type:"application" with the only thing standing out again with this batch as before is the max_number_of_canisters:0 setting.

About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
1 Like
67

Summary:
This proposals were made in order to increase the number of Application Subnets from 51 in the previous IC Target Topology to 60 with the latest to support the growth of Caffeine AI, for more background check the above post. This is the second batch of proposals for the review of the first batch please consider checking this post.

Proposal 137338 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Creates a new Application Subnet with the following configuration:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)
          country: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto: 4.33

Details

    node_provider                                                         data_center       data_center_owner       area                   country
    -------------                                                         -----------       -----------------       ----                   -------
    4fedi-eu6ue-nd7ts-vnof5-hzg66-hgzl7-liy5n-3otyp-h7ipw-owycg-uae  1    an1          1    Datacenter United  1    Brussels Capital  1    BE       2
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1    at2          1    Datasite           1    Douglas           1    CR       1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe  1    br1          1    Digital Realty     1    Flanders          1    HK       2
    6sq7t-knkul-fko6h-xzvnf-ktbvr-jhx7r-hapzr-kjlek-whugy-zt6ip-xqe  1    cr1          1    Equinix            1    Georgia           1    IM       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe  1    hk3          1    Evocative          1    HongKong          2    IN       1
    cgmhq-c4zja-yov4u-zeyao-64ua5-idlhb-ezcgr-cultv-3vqjs-dhwo7-rqe  1    hk4          1    Gasan              1    Panvel            1    JP       1
    g7dkt-aapqq-j3hqt-xtiys-pwapz-idulp-nwagd-zibqm-caxa4-gc23t-3qe  1    im1          1    Manx Telecom       1    San Jose          1    KR       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae  1    kr2          1    Navegalo           1    Seoul             1    SG       2
    rpfvr-s3kuw-xdqrr-pvuuj-hc7hl-olytw-yxlie-fmr74-sr572-6gdqx-iqe  1    pl2          1    Racks Central      1    Singapore         2    US       2
    sixix-2nyqd-t2k2v-vlsyz-dssko-ls4hl-hyij4-y7mdp-ja6cj-nsmpf-yae  1    se1          1    Telin              1    Tokyo             1   
    wwdbq-xuqhf-eydzu-oyl7p-ga565-zm7s7-yrive-ozgsy-zzgh3-qwb3j-cae  1    sg2          1    Yotta              1    Washington        1   
    x7uok-pi537-itm37-unjn3-ewkze-kuetg-kptap-nuqak-auq7z-tn5ey-dqe  1    sg3          1    hkcolo             1                          
    zy4m7-z5mhs-zfkpl-zlsjl-blrbx-mvvmq-5z4zu-mf7eq-hhv7o-ezfro-3ae  1    ty3          1    hkntt              1

This follows the IC Target Topology and has a decentralization close to 5 (best scenario), with four countries having two nodes each (currently the area metric is not considered for the target topology). The biggest difference in the configuration of this subnet compared to others is that the field max_number_of_canisters is set to 0 meaning that currently canisters can’t be deployed on this subnet and a further proposal to upgrade this subnet will be needed.

Proposal 137339 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Creates a new Application Subnet with the following configuration:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 4.00 -> 4.00    (+0%)
          country: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto: 4.50

Details

    node_provider                                                         data_center       data_center_owner       area                   country
    -------------                                                         -----------       -----------------       ----                   -------
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1    an1          1    Continent8         1    Arizona           1    BE       2
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe  1    bc1          1    CyrusOne           1    British Columbia  1    CA       1
    6sq7t-knkul-fko6h-xzvnf-ktbvr-jhx7r-hapzr-kjlek-whugy-zt6ip-xqe  1    br1          1    Cyxtera            1    Brussels Capital  1    CR       1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae  1    bu1          1    Datacenter United  1    Bucuresti         1    DE       1
    acqus-l4yyc-h44lw-grfxw-h7jqf-mtvt3-huwmj-4s372-sc5db-5nsfr-2ae  1    cr1          1    Digital Realty     1    Douglas           1    HK       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe  1    fr2          1    Equinix            1    Flanders          1    IM       1
    glrjs-2dbzh-owbdd-fpp5e-eweoz-nsuto-e3jmk-tl42c-wem4f-qfpfa-qqe  1    hk1          1    Evocative          1    Hesse             1    KR       1
    i7dto-bgkj2-xo5dx-cyrb7-zkk5y-q46eh-gz6iq-qkgyc-w4qte-scgtb-6ae  1    im2          1    Gasan              1    HongKong          1    RO       1
    izmhk-lpjum-uo4oy-lviba-yctpc-arg4b-2ywim-vgoiu-gqaj2-gskmw-2qe  1    kr2          1    M247               1    San Jose          1    SG       2
    r3yjn-kthmg-pfgmb-2fngg-5c7d7-t6kqg-wi37r-j7gy6-iee64-kjdja-jae  1    ph1          1    Navegalo           1    Seoul             1    US       2
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae  1    se1          1    Racks Central      1    Singapore         2   
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae  1    sg2          1    Telin              1    Washington        1   
    x7uok-pi537-itm37-unjn3-ewkze-kuetg-kptap-nuqak-auq7z-tn5ey-dqe  1    sg3          1    Unicom             1

This follows the IC Target Topology and has a decentralization close to 5 (best scenario), with two countries having each two nodes. The biggest difference in the configuration of this subnet compared to others is that the field max_number_of_canisters is set to 0 meaning that currently canisters can’t be deployed on this subnet and a further proposal to upgrade this subnet will be needed.

Proposal 137340 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Creates a new Application Subnet with the following configuration:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto: 4.67

Details

    node_provider                                                         data_center       data_center_owner         area                   country
    -------------                                                         -----------       -----------------         ----                   -------
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1    an1          1    Africa Data Centres  1    Brussels Capital  1    AU       1
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae  1    br1          1    Cyxtera              1    Cape Town         1    BE       2
    acqus-l4yyc-h44lw-grfxw-h7jqf-mtvt3-huwmj-4s372-sc5db-5nsfr-2ae  1    ct1          1    Datacenter United    1    Douglas           1    CA       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe  1    dl1          1    Digital Realty       1    Flanders          1    CH       1
    eipr5-izbom-neyqh-s3ec2-52eww-cyfpg-qfomg-3dpwj-4pffh-34xcu-7qe  1    fr2          1    Equinix              1    Hesse             1    DE       1
    fwnmn-zn7yt-5jaia-fkxlr-dzwyu-keguq-npfxq-mc72w-exeae-n5thj-oae  1    hk4          1    Evocative            1    HongKong          1    HK       1
    optdi-nwa4m-hly3k-6ua4n-sqyxf-yahvb-wps77-ddayn-r7zcz-edla5-7qe  1    im1          1    Flexential           1    Navi Mumbai       1    IM       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae  1    nm1          1    Manx Telecom         1    Ontario           1    IN       1
    rpfvr-s3kuw-xdqrr-pvuuj-hc7hl-olytw-yxlie-fmr74-sr572-6gdqx-iqe  1    sc1          1    NEXTDC               1    Queensland        1    SG       1
    ucjqj-jmbj3-rs4aq-ekzpw-ltjs3-zrcma-t6r3t-m5wxc-j5yrj-unwoj-mae  1    se1          1    Nine.Ch              1    Singapore         1    US       2
    ulyfm-vkxtj-o42dg-e4nam-l4tzf-37wci-ggntw-4ma7y-d267g-ywxi6-iae  1    sg3          1    Racks Central        1    Texas             1    ZA       1
    wdnqm-clqti-im5yf-iapio-avjom-kyppl-xuiza-oaz6z-smmts-52wyg-5ae  1    to2          1    Rivram               1    Washington        1 
    x7uok-pi537-itm37-unjn3-ewkze-kuetg-kptap-nuqak-auq7z-tn5ey-dqe  1    zh3          1    hkntt                1    Zurich            1

This follows the IC Target Topology and has a decentralization close to 5 (best scenario), with two countries having each two nodes. The biggest difference in the configuration of this subnet compared to others is that the field max_number_of_canisters is set to 0 meaning that currently canisters can’t be deployed on this subnet and a further proposal to upgrade this subnet will be needed.

Proposal 137341 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Creates a new Application Subnet with the following configuration:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 4.00 -> 4.00    (+0%)
          country: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto: 4.50

Details

    node_provider                                                         data_center       data_center_owner         area                country
    -------------                                                         -----------       -----------------         ----                -------
    64xe5-tx2s3-4gjmj-pnozr-fejw2-77y5y-rhcjk-glnmx-62brf-qin5q-pqe  1    cm1          1    Africa Data Centres  1    Arizona        1    AU       1
    6nbcy-kprg6-ax3db-kh3cz-7jllk-oceyh-jznhs-riguq-fvk6z-6tsds-rqe  1    cr1          1    CyrusOne             1    Cape Town      1    CH       2
    6sq7t-knkul-fko6h-xzvnf-ktbvr-jhx7r-hapzr-kjlek-whugy-zt6ip-xqe  1    ct1          1    Evocative            1    Colombo        1    CR       1
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe  1    ge1          1    HighDC               1    Geneva         1    HK       2
    cp5ib-twnmx-h4dvd-isef2-tu44u-kb2ka-fise5-m4hta-hnxoq-k45mm-hqe  1    gn1          1    NEXTDC               1    Greater Noida  1    IN       2
    eybf4-6t6bb-unfb2-h2hhn-rrfi2-cd2vs-phksn-jdmbn-i463m-4lzds-vqe  1    hk1          1    Navegalo             1    HongKong       2    LK       1
    g2ax6-jrkmb-3zuh3-jibtb-q5xoq-njrgo-5utbc-j2o7g-zfq2w-yyhky-dqe  1    hk4          1    Nine.Ch              1    Melbourne      1    SG       1
    ihbuj-erwnc-tkjux-tqtnv-zkoar-uniy2-sk2go-xfpkc-znbb4-seukm-wqe  1    mn2          1    OrionStellar         1    Navi Mumbai    1    US       2
    izmhk-lpjum-uo4oy-lviba-yctpc-arg4b-2ywim-vgoiu-gqaj2-gskmw-2qe  1    nm1          1    Rivram               1    San Jose       1    ZA       1
    optdi-nwa4m-hly3k-6ua4n-sqyxf-yahvb-wps77-ddayn-r7zcz-edla5-7qe  1    ph1          1    Telin                1    Singapore      1    
    ucjqj-jmbj3-rs4aq-ekzpw-ltjs3-zrcma-t6r3t-m5wxc-j5yrj-unwoj-mae  1    se1          1    Unicom               1    Washington     1    
    ulyfm-vkxtj-o42dg-e4nam-l4tzf-37wci-ggntw-4ma7y-d267g-ywxi6-iae  1    sg1          1    Yotta                1    Zurich         1    
    w4buy-lgwzr-pccs7-huzhh-qqnws-rns75-iaoox-jolrm-xs2ra-vdu3o-2qe  1    zh4          1    hkntt                1

This follows the IC Target Topology and has a decentralization close to 5 (best scenario), with four countries having two nodes each (currently the area metric is not considered for the target topology). The biggest difference in the configuration of this subnet compared to others is that the field max_number_of_canisters is set to 0 meaning that currently canisters can’t be deployed on this subnet and a further proposal to upgrade this subnet will be needed.

Proposal 137342 – LaCosta | CodeGov

Vote: ADOPT

Creates a new Application Subnet with the following configuration:

    node_provider: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
      data_center: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
data_center_owner: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
             area: 5.00 -> 5.00    (+0%)
          country: 3.00 -> 3.00    (+0%)

Mean Nakamoto: 4.67

Details

    node_provider                                                         data_center       data_center_owner       area                   country
    -------------                                                         -----------       -----------------       ----                   -------
    7at4h-nhtvt-a4s55-jigss-wr2ha-ysxkn-e6w7x-7ggnm-qd3d5-ry66r-cae  1    an1          1    Cloud9             1    Arizona           1    AU       1
    acqus-l4yyc-h44lw-grfxw-h7jqf-mtvt3-huwmj-4s372-sc5db-5nsfr-2ae  1    br1          1    CyrusOne           1    Brussels Capital  1    BE       2
    bvcsg-3od6r-jnydw-eysln-aql7w-td5zn-ay5m6-sibd2-jzojt-anwag-mqe  1    ge1          1    Cyxtera            1    Flanders          1    CA       1
    fwnmn-zn7yt-5jaia-fkxlr-dzwyu-keguq-npfxq-mc72w-exeae-n5thj-oae  1    hu1          1    Datacenter United  1    Geneva            1    CH       2
    izmhk-lpjum-uo4oy-lviba-yctpc-arg4b-2ywim-vgoiu-gqaj2-gskmw-2qe  1    kr1          1    Digital Realty     1    Ljubljana         1    GE       1
    r3yjn-kthmg-pfgmb-2fngg-5c7d7-t6kqg-wi37r-j7gy6-iee64-kjdja-jae  1    lj1          1    Equinix            1    Ontario           1    JP       1
    rbn2y-6vfsb-gv35j-4cyvy-pzbdu-e5aum-jzjg6-5b4n5-vuguf-ycubq-zae  1    ph1          1    Everyware          1    Queensland        1    KR       1
    sixix-2nyqd-t2k2v-vlsyz-dssko-ls4hl-hyij4-y7mdp-ja6cj-nsmpf-yae  1    sc1          1    HighDC             1    Seoul             1    SG       1
    sqhxa-h6ili-qkwup-ohzwn-yofnm-vvnp5-kxdhg-saabw-rvua3-xp325-zqe  1    sg3          1    KT                 1    Singapore         1    SI       1
    vegae-c4chr-aetfj-7gzuh-c23sx-u2paz-vmvbn-bcage-pu7lu-mptnn-eqe  1    tb1          1    NEXTDC             1    Tbilisi           1    US       2
    w4buy-lgwzr-pccs7-huzhh-qqnws-rns75-iaoox-jolrm-xs2ra-vdu3o-2qe  1    to2          1    Posita.si          1    Texas             1   
    wdjjk-blh44-lxm74-ojj43-rvgf4-j5rie-nm6xs-xvnuv-j3ptn-25t4v-6ae  1    ty1          1    Racks Central      1    Tokyo             1   
    x7uok-pi537-itm37-unjn3-ewkze-kuetg-kptap-nuqak-auq7z-tn5ey-dqe  1    zh2          1    TRG                1    Zurich            1

This follows the IC Target Topology and has a decentralization close to 5 (best scenario), with three countries having each two nodes. The biggest difference in the configuration of this subnet compared to others is that the field max_number_of_canisters is set to 0 meaning that currently canisters can’t be deployed on this subnet and a further proposal to upgrade this subnet will be needed.

About CodeGov
CodeGov has a team of developers who review and vote independently on the following proposal topics: IC-OS Version Election, Protocol Canister Management, Subnet Management, Node Admin, and Participant Management. The CodeGov NNS known neuron is configured to follow our reviewers on these technical topics. We also have a group of Followees who vote independently on the Governance and the SNS & Neuron's Fund topics. We strive to be a credible and reliable Followee option that votes on every proposal and every proposal topic in the NNS. We also support decentralization of SNS projects such as WaterNeuron, KongSwap, and Alice with a known neuron and credible Followees.

Learn more about CodeGov and its mission at codegov.org.
68

Proposal 137341 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet.

Total Nodes: 13
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
ked4e… UP Wancloud limited hk1 HongKong 1
6syks… UP ACCUSET SOLUTIONS gn1 Greater Noida 1
qepub… UP Illusions In Art (Pty) Ltd ct1 Cape Town 1
un26u… UP Icaria Systems Pty Ltd mn2 Melbourne 2
svosx… UP OneSixtyTwo Digital Capital sg1 Singapore
yzemk… UP Web3game hk4 HongKong 4
qfzgd… UP DFINITY Stiftung se1 Washington 1
snaam… UP Rivram Inc nm1 Navi Mumbai 1
7muaz… UP GeoNodes LLC cr1 San José 1
fqsoy… UP MI Servers ph1 Phoenix
4aarv… UP Decentralized Entities Foundation ge1 Geneva
uww6o… UP Tomahawk.vc zh4 Zurich 4
suty3… UP Geodd Pvt Ltd cm1 Colombo 1

Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.4

Dimension Nakamoto Coefficient Reason
Provider 5 Wide spread across unique providers
Country 3 Some repetition (HK and IN have 2 nodes each)
City 4 Cities like HongKong and Washington repeat
Data Center 5 All nodes in different data centers
Data Center Owner 5 No single owner hosts multiple nodes

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: All nodes are in UNASSIGNED STATUS for subnet additions

:white_check_mark: Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.4, Fair enough

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

69

Proposal 137341 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △

VOTE: YES

TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet. This proposal also needs stance of possible cluster with Allusion,DeNoDe,NODAO by Dfinity.

Total Nodes: 13
Node ID Status Provider Data Center Location
6souc… UP Starbase ty1 Tokyo
7r64j… UP 43rd Big Idea Films hu1 Houston
kq3sv… UP ANYPOINT PTY LTD sc1 Queensland 1
4g6xd… UP DeNoDe an1 Antwerp
n2h7o… UP Pindar Technology Limited kr1 Seoul 3
nsphz… UP Fractal Labs AG lj1 Ljubljana
chcww… UP Blockchain Development Labs to2 Toronto 2
5nkgj… UP Protocol16 sg3 Singapore 3
ub4s4… UP MI Servers ph1 Phoenix
xqhoe… UP George Bassadone tb1 Tbilisi 1
qgbme… UP Allusion br1 Brussels
jkyha… UP DFINITY Stiftung zh2 Zurich 2
46dt2… UP Decentralized Entities Foundation ge1 Geneva

Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.6

Dimension Nakamoto Coefficient Reason
Provider 5 Well-distributed across multiple unique providers
Country 3 BE and US each appear twice, slightly lowering country diversity
City 5 Cities are highly diverse across nodes
Data Center 5 Each node operates from a unique data center
Data Center Owner 5 No single infrastructure owner dominates

:white_check_mark: Passes:

:white_check_mark: All nodes are in UNASSIGNED STATUS for subnet additions

:white_check_mark: Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.6, closer to 5

You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.

CO.DELTA

We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:

  • Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
  • Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
  • Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.

Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.

70

Summary Chart for Subnet Proposals 137339 to 137342.

output (3)
output (3)3182×1580 262 KB

output (4)
output (4)2779×1180 245 KB