Proposal 137235 Review | Malith H - CO.DELTA △
VOTE: NO 
TLDR:
In line with the forum discussion on increasing the target topology to support the launch of Caffeine, and following the intent of proposal 137147, this proposal creates a new application subnet for US. Issue is there is no proper validation method currently implemented for Nakamoto Coefficient calculations which is based on the global distribution. Country adjusted implementation still falls short. I would suggest to have country based calculation implemented that justifies node distribution before new country base subnet is implemented. Vote to reject.
Total Nodes: 13
| Node ID | Status | Provider | Data Center | Location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| g6qhu… | UNASSIGNED | NODAO | mm1 | Miami |
| nusc3… | UNASSIGNED | InfoObjects | sj3 | California 3 |
| m7fhy… | UNASSIGNED | Bigger Capital | aw1 | Allentown |
| m23z7… | UNASSIGNED | Uvaca Labs LLC | pl1 | Portland |
| fdunq… | UNASSIGNED | NoviSystems, LLC | fm1 | Fremont |
| flwxw… | UNASSIGNED | 87m Neuron, LLC | dl1 | Dallas |
| hizzw… | UNASSIGNED | MI Servers | ph1 | Phoenix |
| ou6hm… | UNASSIGNED | DFINITY Stiftung | se1 | Washington 1 |
| svvvx… | UNASSIGNED | Giant Leaf, LLC | or1 | Orlando |
| gbsw6… | UNASSIGNED | 100 Count Holdings, LLC | ch3 | Chicago 3 |
| wqqsg… | UNASSIGNED | 43rd Big Idea Films | hu1 | Houston |
| icbco… | UNASSIGNED | BLP22, LLC | at2 | Atlanta 2 |
| s4nii… | UNASSIGNED | Arceau NP LLC | ch2 | Chicago 2 |
Nakamoto Coefficient: 4.0
| Dimension | Nakamoto Coefficient | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | 5 | Diverse set of node providers |
| Location (City) | 3 | Duplicate states Texas, Florida, Illinois |
| Data Center | 5 | Each node is hosted in a different data center |
| Data Center Owner | 3 | Repetition across CyrusOne, Datasite, and Tierpoint |
Passes:
Issues:
You may wish to follow the CO.DELTA known neuron if you found this analysis helpful.
CO.DELTA
We’re a verifiably decentralised collective who review IC deltas (changes applied by NNS proposals). We follow a common code:
- Look: We observe the details and context of NNS proposals
- Test: We test and verify the claims made by those proposals
- Automate: We automate as much as possible by building increasingly sophisticated tools that streamline and strengthen the reviewal process.
Every vote cast by CO.DELTA is the result of consensus among diligent, skilled and experienced team members acting independently. The CO.DELTA neuron follows the vote of D-QUORUM on NNS topics that the CO.DELTA team does not handle directly. You can therefore follow CO.DELTA on all topics and rely on the highest quality of vote.